*BSD News Article 37040


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:13880 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3749
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!berke
From: berke@panix.com (Wayne Berke)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: How UTTERLY Amazing! (Was Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD)
Date: 17 Oct 1994 17:21:19 GMT
Organization: Nalgame Dios, Ltd.
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <37ubqf$3ae@news.panix.com>
References: <37fvk8$9mm@rivendell.apana.org.au> <37p5f2$kjl@cleese.apana.org.au> <hart.782272416@apanix.apana.org.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: berke.dialup.access.net
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1

hart@apanix.apana.org.au (Leigh Hart) writes:

>So in reality, flame expects a pointer to struct twit, whereas phil only
>passed the struct itself.  Lets rewrite that code for the pedants (mark):

>while(&jesus) flame(&jesus);

Oh no!  Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems like an infinite loop!
Hopefully, the flame() function a judicious call to exit().
--
Wayne Berke
berke@panix.com