Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:13880 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3749 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!berke From: berke@panix.com (Wayne Berke) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: How UTTERLY Amazing! (Was Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD) Date: 17 Oct 1994 17:21:19 GMT Organization: Nalgame Dios, Ltd. Lines: 12 Message-ID: <37ubqf$3ae@news.panix.com> References: <37fvk8$9mm@rivendell.apana.org.au> <37p5f2$kjl@cleese.apana.org.au> <hart.782272416@apanix.apana.org.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: berke.dialup.access.net X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 hart@apanix.apana.org.au (Leigh Hart) writes: >So in reality, flame expects a pointer to struct twit, whereas phil only >passed the struct itself. Lets rewrite that code for the pedants (mark): >while(&jesus) flame(&jesus); Oh no! Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems like an infinite loop! Hopefully, the flame() function a judicious call to exit(). -- Wayne Berke berke@panix.com