*BSD News Article 37121


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!gateway.dircsa.org.au!cleese.apana.org.au!cleese.apana.org.au!not-for-mail
From: newton@cleese.apana.org.au (Mark Newton)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD
Date: 20 Oct 1994 16:53:44 +0930
Organization: cleese.apana.org.au Public Access UNIX +61-8-3736006
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3855u0$3j9@cleese.apana.org.au>
References: <CHARNIER.94Oct13153401@baobab.lirmm.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cleese.apana.org.au
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

In article <CHARNIER.94Oct13153401@baobab.lirmm.fr>, Philippe CHARNIER (charnier@lirmm.fr) wrote:

 > I did the following :
 >  - install X        (1 month)
 >  - install Y        (3 days)
 >  - install X again  (2 months)
 >  - install Z        (more than a year)

 > Now I am running Z and I am very happy. Others are very happy to run X
 > or Y. 

You're a complete moron!  Y is *far* better than Z, and always will be!

X is a complete waste of time -- Not even worth considering.

I'm running Y on a 300MHz 80486 with 5Gb of RAM and 15Tb of disk. Y
consumes much less disk space and memory than either Z *or* X, it's
compatible with every piece of software ever written for any architecture,
and its networking code is perfect.  No, really!

   - mark :-)
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried an internal modem,                newton@cleese.apana.org.au
     but it hurt when I walked.                          Mark Newton
----- Voice: +61-8-3735575 --------------- Data: +61-8-3736006 -----