Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:13916 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3775 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!nic.tip.net!palantir.p.tvt.se!pp2.smc.south.telia.se!paul From: paul@pp2.smc.south.telia.se (Paul Pries) Subject: Re: How UTTERLY Amazing! (Was Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD) Message-ID: <1994Oct11.070639.27030@palantir.p.tvt.se> Sender: news@palantir.p.tvt.se (News account) Organization: Swedish Telecom X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4 References: <CHRISB.94Oct11095325@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 07:06:39 GMT Lines: 25 chrisb@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Chris Bitmead) writes: : In article <jmonroyCxG197.MqI@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: [ A lot of stuff nuked, both good and baaaaad...] : : > I've spoken to many people on this and they feel : > that Chicago or Mach or maybe OS/2 might offer : > better resources to applications programmers. : > Hence, the feeling that *BSD might be on it's : > death bed. Certainly, the lack of interest by : > programmers in general, especially when compared : > to other OSs as a whole, tends to prove my point. : : Ok, let's rename the FreeBSD team to the BSD Chicago 95 team and the : NetBSD Team to the OS BSD/2 team. And what about the vapourous 386BSD-1.0? Shouldn't that also be renamed? If we follow the analogy, wouldn't it be called "BSD DOS 1.0" ? ;-) As the man syes, I couldn't resist... -- Paul Pries paul@pp2.smc.south.telia.se