Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2645 comp.os.linux.development:17797 comp.unix.bsd:15144
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix.gen.nz!madhat!htweedie
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.linux.development,comp.unix.bsd
From: htweedie@madhat.actrix.gen.nz (Hamish Tweedie)
Subject: Re: We a FAQ: Linux vs. *BSD!!!
References: <jmonroyCxLro2.IF6@netcom.com> <37m8va$hhg@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu> <jmonroyCxqEM1.EMt@netcom.com> <6iHekapDljaN071yn@halcyon.com>
Reply-To: htweedie@madhat.actrix.gen.nz
X-Charset: iso-8859-1
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <htweedie.0ll1@madhat.actrix.gen.nz>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 94 23:54:59 +1200
Organization: The mad HATter's madhouse
Lines: 24
In article <6iHekapDljaN071yn@halcyon.com> mpdillon@halcyon.com (Michael Dillon) writes:
> So the serious answer is, "It depends...". Because of this, I think
> a FAQ would be very useful. And I wouldn't limit it to just
> BSD vs. Linux. I would also include Coherent (more commercial
> applications available), Minix (runs on 286, 8086, Amiga),
> SCO UNIX, Solaris for x86, BSD/OS from BSDI, etc...
> They are all strong in some areas and weak in others.
Is there any information out there concerning any of the above
mentioned options? You can't tell me that nobody has puvlished a FAQ about
any of the above :-)
> Michael Dillon Internet: mpdillon@halcyon.com
--
==> htweedie@madhat.actrix.gen.nz Bombora 272 sailor|
==> OR tweedie_h@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz | RZ350, R65,|
==> OR H.Tweedie@massey.ac.nz | K75S rider.|
-----------
1st Law Economists: For every economist there exists an equal and
opposite economist.
2nd Law Economists: They're both always wrong!