Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!usenet.ee.pdx.edu!fastrac.llnl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!moocow.cs.uh.edu!wjin From: wjin@moocow.cs.uh.edu (Woody Jin) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Why 386BSD Why not Linux Date: 30 Oct 1994 05:13:42 GMT Organization: University of Houston Lines: 13 Message-ID: <38va26$4qn@masala.cc.uh.edu> References: <denis.63.2EA767CB@xerxes.crbm.cnrs-mop.fr> <38e6el$88f@ucthpx.uct.ac.za> <jmonroyCyFA9q.5GF@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: moocow.cs.uh.edu In article <jmonroyCyFA9q.5GF@netcom.com>, Jesus Monroy Jr <jmonroy@netcom.com> wrote: > >: 386BSD Non-player at this stage. 386BSD 0.1 is too old and >: 386BSD 1.0 is vapourware. >: > OK... first thing first. 386bsd R1.0 is supposed to ship > the first week or second week of November. What year ? -- Woody Jin