Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:28456 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3889 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.hk.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!news.clark.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!selway.umt.edu!not-for-mail From: michael@selway.umt.edu (Michael Babcock) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: LINUX SUCKS!!!! Date: 30 Oct 1994 15:47:23 -0700 Organization: University of Montana, Missoula Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3917pr$ro5@selway.umt.edu> References: <085334Z20101994@anon.penet.fi> <38mj72$a82@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <1994Oct28.041604.589@escape.widomaker.com> <38up48INN1o5e@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: selway.umt.edu In article <38up48INN1o5e@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE>, Stefan Esser <se@FileServ1.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE> wrote: >The filesystem is one of the parts, where >BSD is far more advanced than Linux, in >both speed and robustness (nobody in their >right mind would use the option to switch >off synchronous metadata updates under BSD, >since this might void your filesystem in >case of a crash, as is the default under >Linux). The above paragraph, of course, is wrong. Michael Babcock michael@selway.umt.edu And since this is Usenet I have to add: I'm not saying that Linux or BSD is better, I'm only saying what I said.