*BSD News Article 38128


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4153 alt.folklore.computers:68028
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!quagga.ru.ac.za!ucthpx!itu1.sun.ac.za!arichfld
From: arichfld@cs.sun.ac.za (Antony Richfield)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: BSD sluggish compared to Linux?
Date: 20 Nov 1994 19:23:05 GMT
Organization: University of Stellenbosch
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <3ao7mp$cu7@itu1.sun.ac.za>
References: <3am248$7kv@itu1.sun.ac.za> <jsmCzKHK8.Ev1@netcom.com> <3ao31t$9fo@itu1.sun.ac.za> <3ao791$bc4@ucthpx.uct.ac.za>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.232.212.20
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]

Russell Vincent (vincent@ucthpx.uct.ac.za) wrote:
: Antony Richfield (arichfld@cs.sun.ac.za) wrote:

: : No, sir, I am getting exactly what I wanted;  email telling me the exact 
: : relative merits of both OSes from both points of view.  It's the effects,

: Aha - so you are going to post a summary of your findings for everyone
: else to benefit from your sneaky plot - are you not?

I don't actually think of it as sneaky, but sure, although what findings
there are so far are strictly my impressions of a minor flood, a large
part of which was just uninformative.

There is a fair amount of consensus, apparently, that NetBSD outperforms
Linux on specifically net-based tasks, but the picture (esp. with the newer
patch levels of Linux) is by no means as clear.  Linux is, by contrast,
given higher honours (largely derived from subjective reports, but very
consistent) for responsiveness at the console, at the price, apparently, of
some efficiency in number-crunching and related activities, context switching
being one of the reasons.

In the stakes for being promising in terms of future support there is some
ambiguity;  Linux easily wins in terms of user-population and broadness
of support, but BSD has a more unified, clear approach, which has, no doubt,
its values.  However one result of this is the suspect stability of each
new Linux patch level until it is proven

The above posted as a public service, FWIW, YMMV, etc, etc ....

Antony Richfield at the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
GAT d? H s+:- g+ p?+ !au a22 w+++ v?*(+) C+ U? P-- L 3 E- N++ K+(---) W-- M-- !V
-po+ Y+ t !5 !j R++ G'' !tv b++ D+ B? e+(*)>++++ u**(*) h*(-) f--(?)@ r-- !n !y*
-----------------------------------GEEK CODE 2.1-------------------------------