Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jkh From: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0 newer boot.flp bad? Date: 23 Nov 1994 19:36:37 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 16 Message-ID: <3b05k5$nmm@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <3athn9$7f0@lucy.infi.net> <3atnup$bln@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <3auqeq$5is@Tut.MsState.Edu> <RICK.94Nov23135010@vox.trystero.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu In article <RICK.94Nov23135010@vox.trystero.com>, Richard E. Nickle <rick@vox.trystero.com> wrote: > 2.0 release's boot flp id bigger than 1.44 as well...? Not bigger - the same size. > it will get smaller when you rawrite or dd it to the actual floppie. No it won't. >Small enough to fit on a 1.2Mb floppy? Nope. >I don't wanna have to rip my machine apart to reload FreeBSD!!! Sorry! :-( Jordan