Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!rahul.net!a2i!bjork.a2i!bjork From: Steven Bjork <bjork@rahul.net> Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Easiest to port: Free, Net, or 386 (bsd)? Date: 24 Nov 1994 17:59:22 GMT Organization: a2i network Lines: 9 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3b2k9q$11q@hustle.rahul.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: foxtrot.rahul.net NNTP-Posting-User: bjork Keywords: porting, hacks, sunos4 Seeing as how there's a *lot* of software running on sunos4 that I'd like to run on one of the 3b's (oops) Free B's, my question is... Which of freebsd, netbsd or 386bsd has the least pain of porting involved for big stuff such as Kerberos, etc? I have a port of Kerberos V4 sort of running on bsdi and it was not just a matter of typing "make." ../Steven