Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:14758 comp.os.386bsd.development:2723 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!oracle.pnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!zib-berlin.de!news.belwue.de!delos.stgt.sub.org!nadia.s.bawue.de!luva!migieger From: migieger@luva.lb.bawue.de (Michael Giegerich) Subject: Re: AHA 2742/2842 cards *will* be supported in 2.0BETA (and -current) Organization: private FreeBSD site Message-ID: <Czx867.ApG@luva.lb.bawue.de> References: <JKH.94Nov17191446@freefall.cdrom.com> <3b4vgc$61f@gnu.mat.uc.pt> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 1994 10:08:31 GMT Lines: 22 In article <3b4vgc$61f@gnu.mat.uc.pt>, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro <rps@mat.uc.pt> wrote: >Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@freefall.cdrom.com) wrote: >> And it will support the Adaptec 27xx/28xx cards by default. Support >> is already in -current, so current folk can use it as of this (Thursday) >> morning. > >How did people got enough information to do the drivers ? > - Did Adaptec changed its policy ? > - Or did people found a work-around ? (I remember seing a post by > someone explaining that the information that Adaptect didn't want to > give was not strictly necessary) > - Or did they reverse-engineered ? > - Or shouldn't I be asking ? :) No, you're asking the same questions I had reading the previous posting. -Michael -- ------------------------------+------------------------------ Michael Giegerich | migieger@luva.lb.bawue.de ------------------------------+------------------------------