*BSD News Article 38661


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4275 comp.os.linux.misc:30751
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!daemon.apana.org.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!oracle.pnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!cronkite.nersc.gov!dancer.ca.sandia.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!michaelv
From: michaelv@MindBender.HeadCandy.com (Michael L. VanLoon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How fast? [was: ... slugish ...]
Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: 30 Nov 1994 02:05:45 GMT
Organization: HeadCandy Associates... Sweets for the lobes.
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <MICHAELV.94Nov29200545@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
References: <1994Nov28.194617.18912@system9.unisys.com> <3bf6ou$pm7@wup-gate.wup.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mindbender.headcandy.iastate.edu
In-reply-to: andreas@wup.de's message of 29 Nov 1994 12:28:14 GMT

In article <3bf6ou$pm7@wup-gate.wup.de> andreas@wup.de (Andreas Klemm) writes:

   Alex  Dumitru (alexd@system9.unisys.com) wrote:

   : Ok! After wadding through tons and tons of articles, I have yet
   : to see some definitive numbers. Several people suggested running
   : some test, but so far nothing.

   I offered on the freebsd mailingliste a few benchmark results under
   compareable machines.

   SS2, 486/33 Linux Slackware, 486/33 FreeBSD 1.1, 486/33 FreeBSD 2.0 ALPHA

   It would be a good idea to do that again with

	   FreeBSD 2,0 RELEASE
	   Linux XXXware (with XXX= Slack or LST)
		   using a 1.0.X kernel
		   and the experimental one, where SCSI driver or such might
		   be improved, using another write optimization (note:
		   as far as I know they need a apecial bdflush program for 
		   the scsi cluster code).

Why leave out NetBSD-1.0???

   : I have a 386sx/25 with 4Mb, with a 200+ MB IDE, Hercules card ...
   : It is used right now for loading (and reloading) FreeBSD to get some
   : notes down on the installation procedure.

   What strikes me most are the 4 MB RAM. With that equipement I normally
   wouldn't do a benchmark, since you aren't sure if swapping or paging
   (depends on the amount of daemon programs that are executed when going
   into multiuser mode) give strabge results ...

Definitely.  You're not really comparing the OS as much there, but
just waiting on the disk.  I think you'd want at least 8MB RAM to test
the systems with...

   You wouldn't expect a benchmark of a SPARCstation with 4 or 8 MB in a
   Unix Magazine, too ;-)

--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
   Michael L. VanLoon     michaelv@HeadCandy.com     michaelv@iastate.edu
  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x for PC/Mac/Amiga/etc.
     Working NetBSD ports: 386+PC, Mac, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4c, PC532
               In progress: DEC pmax (MIPS R2k/3k), VAX, Sun4m
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -