Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:14831 comp.os.linux.misc:30760 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au!news.tansu.com.au!picasso.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au!newshost!chrisb From: chrisb@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Chris Bitmead) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: ELF and dynamic loading (Re: 386BSD vs Linux) Date: 1 Dec 94 16:18:03 Organization: Telecom Australia Lines: 9 Message-ID: <CHRISB.94Dec1161803@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> References: <CzM9tE.C83@info.swan.ac.uk> <3aqs7t$cp3@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <CztKMo.K4A@info.swan.ac.uk> <Czu7u5.D7J@deshaw.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au In-reply-to: christos@deshaw.com's message of Fri, 25 Nov 1994 19:08:29 GMT In article <Czu7u5.D7J@deshaw.com> christos@deshaw.com (Christos Zoulas) writes: >Actually the problem is not the ioctl's! These are simple to implement on >top of the existing terminal driver. The problem is missing subsystems >such as streams, tli, etc. which are used to implement the networking code. >And you need the networking code to run any X application... >Another problem is pty implementation; fortunately only a handful of >applications use ptys. Bsd doesn't have streams or tli.