Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4278 alt.folklore.computers:68712 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,alt.folklore.computers Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!oracle.pnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!cronkite.nersc.gov!dancer.ca.sandia.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: BSD sluggish compared to Linux? Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <CzzCqE.2I7@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <3am248$7kv@itu1.sun.ac.za> <Czq128.506@bonkers.taronga.com> <3b0ut5$637@itu1.sun.ac.za> <3bbi0r$dff@muise.hookup.net> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 13:42:13 GMT Lines: 14 In article <3bbi0r$dff@muise.hookup.net>, mike muise <mike@muise.hookup.net> wrote: >: Um, he's gotten information. Whether it's accurate or not is at this point >: unknown. He hasn't done it without starting a flame war. Want to try again? >Uh, my point was that it was done without starting a Linux vs. BSD >flamewar. Like that's some advantage? >Any flames were critical of the method, _not_ of the OSes >in question. Is it accurate? He won't say, he won't post a summary, and he implied it wasn't.