Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48186 comp.unix.bsd:15408 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7565 comp.unix.solaris:27507 comp.unix.unixware:14493 Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!daemon.apana.org.au!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.infi.net!taylor.infi.net!mark From: mark@taylor.infi.net (Mark Davis) Subject: Re: Unix for PC Organization: Lake Taylor Hospital Computer Services Distribution: inet Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 14:11:20 GMT Message-ID: <1994Dec01.141120.14949@taylor.infi.net> References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bikh6$hk8@bantu.Provo.Novell.COM> <D03L47.FxJ@ct.covia.com> Lines: 29 tundra@ct.covia.com (Tundra Tim Daneliuk) writes: >>|> >I have narrowed down to: >>|> > SCO Unix >>|> > Sun Solaris >>|> > IBM AIX >>|> > Novell Unixware >>|> >>|> If you must pick one of these, I'd say Solaris is the most stable. >>|> >> >You can't be serious! Solaris is buggy and **SLOW**. What version have YOU ever used? We find 2.3 to be quite functional. 2.4 is supposedely even better. > Personally, I'd >pick none of the above There is nothing wrong with SCO either, not as far as stability. We run our whole hospital on it and I have never seen ANY OS more stable. -- /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Mark A. Davis | Lake Taylor Hospital | Norfolk,VA (804)-461-5001x431 | | Director/SysAdmin | Information Systems | mark@taylor.infi.net | \--------------------------------------------------------------------------/