Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48189 comp.unix.bsd:15413 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7568 comp.unix.solaris:27509 comp.unix.unixware:14499 Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!daemon.apana.org.au!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!slate!mbarkah From: mbarkah@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Ade Barkah) Subject: Re: Unix for PC Message-ID: <1994Dec1.173254.17071@slate.mines.colorado.edu> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 17:32:54 GMT Distribution: inet References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bihms$5pf@decaxp.harvard.edu> <palowodaD04HqA.LAJ@netcom.com> <3bkt7c$b77@news.uni-c.dk> Organization: Colorado School of Mines X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Followup-To: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Lines: 17 Peter Dalgaard SFE (pd@kubism.ku.dk) wrote: : ... Slackware has been runnable at a level comparable to SunOS : 4.1.x for at least the past year. Remaining problems are nowhere : near comparable to what we are seeing currently with Solaris! Which problems are you referring to ? We're getting Solaris 2.4 to evaluate, and haven't heard anything of such magnitude that would prompt the above remark. Could you elaborate on major problems with Solaris 2.4 ? Thanks, -Ade Barkah -- Head of Development Renaissance Knowledge Systems Englewood, Colorado