Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48198 comp.unix.bsd:15418 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7572 comp.unix.solaris:27521 comp.unix.unixware:14509 comp.unix.sys5.r4:8737 Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware,comp.unix.sys5.r4 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!werple.apana.org.au!otis.apana.org.au!daemon.apana.org.au!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!bry From: bry@netcom.com (Bryan Althaus) Subject: Re: Unix for PC Message-ID: <bryD05Grs.A2u@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bihms$5pf@decaxp.harvard.edu> <palowodaD04HqA.LAJ@netcom.com> <3bkt7c$b77@news.uni-c.dk> <1994Dec1.173254.17071@slate.mines.colorado.edu> Distribution: inet Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 20:55:03 GMT Lines: 25 Ade Barkah (mbarkah@slate.mines.colorado.edu) wrote: : Peter Dalgaard SFE (pd@kubism.ku.dk) wrote: : : ... Slackware has been runnable at a level comparable to SunOS : : 4.1.x for at least the past year. Remaining problems are nowhere : : near comparable to what we are seeing currently with Solaris! : Which problems are you referring to ? We're getting Solaris 2.4 : to evaluate, and haven't heard anything of such magnitude that : would prompt the above remark. Could you elaborate on major : problems with Solaris 2.4 ? I'd be interested also. They are not talking about Solaris 2.4 but earlier versions like Solaris 2.2 or Solaris 2.3. solaris 2.3 with the recommended patchs is known to be pretty stable but still is nothing compared to Solaris 2.4. When solaris 2.4 for Sparc ships next week (Dec 6th) these people will see what Solaris 2.4 Intel users have know for awhile, that Solaris 2.4 is as stable as SunOs 4.1.x. -- Regards, Bryan Althaus bryan@krf.com