Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:15445 comp.lang.c:87182 comp.unix.sys5.r3:2301 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news1.oakland.edu!detroit.freenet.org!detroit.freenet.org!not-for-mail From: brose@detroit.freenet.org (Karl Brose) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.lang.c,comp.unix.sys5.r3 Subject: Re: how to completely get rid of bcopy, bzero, bcmp? Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd,comp.lang.c,comp.unix.sys5.r3 Date: 2 Dec 1994 04:08:52 -0500 Organization: "Brose Information Technologies" Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3bmo74$oan@detroit.freenet.org> References: <3bksus$fg4@spruce.cic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.freenet.org X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Paul Southworth (pauls@locust.cic.net) wrote: > return; /* too bad */ > bcopy(ptr, def_slcbuf, len); > } > What should that bcopy() look like to make this SVR3 system happy? > Is there a "right" way to implement bcopy() etc on this system so I could > generate my own compatibility library and not bother with altering the > code every time? #define bcopy(a,b,n) memcpy((b),(a),(n)) -- Karl H. Brose Greater Detroit Free-Net brose@detroit.freenet.org