Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48401 comp.unix.bsd:15456 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7625 comp.unix.solaris:27791 comp.unix.unixware:14786 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!fwi.uva.nl!not-for-mail From: casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Subject: Re: Unix for PC Date: 6 Dec 1994 22:52:29 +0100 Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam Lines: 14 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <3c2met$kmn@mail.fwi.uva.nl> References: <3bvmo1$hgr@cascade.pnw.net> <3c0cir$5i2@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <STEINAR.HAUG.94Dec6203939@runit.sintef.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.fwi.uva.nl Steinar.Haug@runit.sintef.no (Steinar Haug) writes: >I'd rather suggest that they consider installing some patches for 4.1.3. >Our general impression here is that 4.1.3 (suitably patched) is still >much more stable than 2.3 (suitably patched). Uptime of 59 days is *not* >particularly impressive - we have many 4.1.3 systems which have been up >much longer than that. (Is this going to be another my uptime is bigger than yours battle?). We have average uptimes > 100 days. (Averaged over > 100 machines) Some machines stay up for 450+ days. Casper