Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48530 comp.unix.bsd:15493 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7654 comp.unix.solaris:27947 comp.unix.unixware:14905 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!night.primate.wisc.edu!caen!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!swrinde!pipex!uunet!retix!dee!joshua From: joshua@sleepy.retix.com (joshua geller) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Subject: Re: Unix for PC Date: 07 Dec 1994 20:28:48 GMT Organization: Institute for the Study of Ancient Science Lines: 25 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <JOSHUA.94Dec7122848@sleepy.retix.com> References: <3bvmo1$hgr@cascade.pnw.net> <3c0cir$5i2@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: sleepy.retix.com In-reply-to: kjc@Eng.Sun.COM's message of 6 Dec 1994 00:51:39 GMT In article <3c0cir$5i2@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> kjc@Eng.Sun.COM (Kevin Clarke) writes: > In article hgr@cascade.pnw.net, bobg@pnw.net (Robert Gerrish) writes: > >Peter Dalgaard SFE (pd@kubism.ku.dk) wrote: > >: As a sysadmin on both Suns and Linux systems, I can assure you > >: that Slackware has been runnable at a level comparable to SunOS > >: 4.1.x for at least the past year. Remaining problems are nowhere > >: near comparable to what we are seeing currently with Solaris! > >I am a sysadmin for both Suns and Linux systems. Our main linusx system > >has an uptime of over 59 days. We can barely get by on the suns on SunOS > >4.1.3 for two weeks without having to reboot for some reason. > Then I guess it is time to upgrade those 4.1.x machines to Solaris 2.4! > Kevin Clarke - SunSoft are you seriously maintaining, with your bare face hanging out, that solaris 2.4 regularly goes longer without rebooting than sunos 4.1.3.u1 or sunos 4.1.4? josh