*BSD News Article 39155


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48545 comp.unix.bsd:15497 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7660 comp.unix.solaris:27961 comp.unix.unixware:14918
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!nntp.et.byu.edu!news.provo.novell.com!bikini!darrend
From: darrend@bikini.USG.Sandy.Novell.COM (Darren R. Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware
Subject: Re: Unix for PC
Date: 8 Dec 1994 23:56:44 GMT
Organization: Novell Inc.
Lines: 62
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3c86fs$3k5@bantu.Provo.Novell.COM>
References: <3bvmo1$hgr@cascade.pnw.net> <STEINAR.HAUG.94Dec6203939@runit.sintef.no> <D0Ex7E.2nv@ssbunews.ih.att.com> <3c4rhh$54a@bantu.provo.novell.com> <3c5cos$bhb@crl7.crl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bikini.usg.sandy.novell.com

In article <3c5cos$bhb@crl7.crl.com>, jpatrick@crl.com (J. Heather Patrick) writes:
|> In article <3c4rhh$54a@bantu.provo.novell.com>,
|> Darren R. Davis <darrend@bikini.USG.Sandy.Novell.COM> wrote:
|> >
|> >Yet another subjective statement.  What criteria was used in determining
|> >feature rich.  What features does Solaris have that are not present in
|> >UnixWare?  How many features does UnixWare have the Solaris doesn't?  :^)
|> >How about price?  The value of UnixWare is not diminished at all if you
|> >are not going to use the NetWare connectivity.  UnixWare is just as capable
|> >OS as is Solaris.
|> 
|> 
|> Not.
|> 
|> 1) cachefs
Cache for what?  Memory?  How about memfs in UnixWare 2.0.

|> 2) better NFS in general
Again subjective, I want numbers!  (Just as a note, where do you think we
got our NFS implementation from?)

|> 3) thread support
UnixWare 2.0

|> 4) a much more standard and full set of code libraries
Huh, more standard in what way?  Who's standard?  Sun's?
Remember X/Open?  Remember Unix Trademark? Remember XPG3/POSIX and any
other standard you want to compare on?  Give me a break.

|> 5) a better X server
Subject! Give me numbers.

|> 6) a better X environment
A non-standard X environment!

|> 7) MAE availability  [on sparc]
Let's keep it apples to apples.  Just Intel please.  Besides, I fell
that a Mac emulation environment is about as usefull as a DOS one.

|> 8) working man pages
Mine work fine.

|> 9) a proper sysvr4 kernal that doesn't have to be compiled
What does this mean?

|> 10) better compilers/tools available (centerline, purify, ...) [on sparc]
Sunsoft, Centerline, and Purify all ship for UnixWare.  Why don't you
check it out before you comment.

|> 
|> 
|> Do you think 10 reasons comprises "more capable", or should I go on?
|> 
|> 
Please do, how about some numbers next time.  I could make the same
statements myself.  :^)

Darren R. Davis
UnixWare Developer Support Engineer
Novell Developer Support