Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!news.clark.edu!sun.lclark.edu!news.reed.edu!usenet.ee.pdx.edu!fastrac.llnl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!ames!hookup!news.mathworks.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!caen!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: Sharing partitions between FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 and 2.0 Date: 8 Dec 1994 20:02:13 GMT Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman Montana Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3c7oo5$fos@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <D0Hy2E.2E9@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> <3c7f7k$cue@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <3c7ib9$ipu@grapevine.lcs.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <3c7ib9$ipu@grapevine.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett A. Wollman <wollman@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: >In article <3c7f7k$cue@pdq.coe.montana.edu>, >Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> wrote: > >>Something is happening to the super-blocks. It may be symlinks, >>[...] > >It's the clean bit, Nate. The clean bit is only stored in the main >superblock, which is why fsck likes the first alternate. Doesn't 2.0 recognize it's a 1.X system and NOT try to do the clean bit handling? Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD dude and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-5980 | Unemployed, looking for permanant work in home #: (406) 586-0579 | CS/EE field.