Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.aix:48698 comp.unix.bsd:15537 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7709 comp.unix.solaris:28163 comp.unix.unixware:15069 Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!hookup!news.moneng.mei.com!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.kei.com!ub!csn!slate!mbarkah From: mbarkah@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Ade Barkah) Subject: Re: Unix for PC Message-ID: <1994Dec2.184251.27913@slate.mines.colorado.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 18:42:51 GMT Distribution: inet References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <CHRISB.94Nov30100302@stork.cssc-syd.tansu.com.au> <3bikh6$hk8@bantu.Provo.Novell.COM> <D03L47.FxJ@ct.covia.com> <1994Dec01.141120.14949@taylor.infi.net> <D070nI.54E@rn.com> Organization: Colorado School of Mines X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Followup-To: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.unixware Lines: 17 Larry Snyder (larry@rn.com) wrote: : mark@taylor.infi.net (Mark Davis) writes: : >There is nothing wrong with SCO either, not as far as stability. We run : >our whole hospital on it and I have never seen ANY OS more stable. : If you can live within it's limitations and are happy using something : based on a product that's so old (how old is 3.2 these days, 7 years?).. Well, I must say, that's not a "fair" statement. Indeed SCO is based on 3.2, but then, so is SVR4. =) It's not like SCO just let the code stagnate for seven years; they've added their share of improvements all these times too. "If it ain't broke..."... -Ade Barkah