Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4394 comp.os.linux.misc:31516 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!caen!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newshost.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!wes From: wes@indirect.com (Barnacle Wes) Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX Message-ID: <D0qAG6.G0q@indirect.com> Sender: usenet@indirect.com (System Operator) Organization: the Briney (notso) Deep Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 02:48:05 GMT References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <3cdn8t$q89@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2.1 [BP] PL2.1] Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Lines: 11 In article <QUINLAN.94Dec8192943@shell1.best.com> quinlan@shell1.best.com (Daniel Quinlan) writes: > Where were loadable kernel modules first implemented? Juergen Nickelsen (nickel@prz.tu-berlin.de) wrote: : SunOS 4 was early, but I don't know if it was the first. And in the free world, NetBSD 0.9 had loadable kernel modules, courtesy Terry Lambert, about 2 years ago (I believe... Terry?) Wes Peters