Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Hardware for FreeBSD 2.0 From: barnaby.ng@canrem.com (Barnaby Ng) Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!ns1.nodak.edu!news.uoknor.edu!constellation!convex!insosf1.infonet.net!newshost.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!torn!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!portnoy!canrem.com!barnaby.ng Distribution: world Message-ID: <60.10007.5307.0N1C354A@canrem.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 01:10:00 -0500 Organization: CRS Online (Toronto, Ontario) Lines: 22 In acticle <3ccov7$m9p@pdq.coe.montana.edu> nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) wrote:- >>ATI Graphic Turbo with 2MB VRAM (Mach64 chipset, VL bus version) >>Adaptec 2842VL SCSI host (AIC7770 chipset, VL bus version) > >It should work fine. > >>and I like to hear from people who has actually used it, not just >>according to the spec. > >For us to say that it works on the above hardware means that it's >been tested on the above hardware. What more can I say? If your >hardware is bad, then it won't work, but if your hardware is okay >AND it's the above type, then it should work. I guess I should say "does it work well" instead. For example, I know my Mach 64 "works" under Linux (X), but only under non-accelarated mode, and unable to support 1024x768x16M. Sorry for any misunderstanding. barnaby.ng@canrem.com Toronto, Canada.