*BSD News Article 39474


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:15578 comp.unix.solaris:28343
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!igor.rutgers.edu!geneva.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail
From: hedrick@geneva.rutgers.edu (Chuck Hedrick)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Unix for PC
Date: 13 Dec 1994 22:13:25 -0500
Organization: Rutgers University LCSR
Lines: 19
Sender: hedrick@cs.rutgers.edu
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3clnsl$207@geneva.rutgers.edu>
References: <199411210319.TAA18133@nic.cerf.net> <3cdkob$4t1@fido.asd.sgi.com> <3cfhlv$dbl@spruce.cic.net> <bryD0qAFn.4HF@netcom.com> <3ckjh0$gmq@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: geneva.rutgers.edu

nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:

>FreeBSD is trying to be a 'damn good OS', same as Linux.  However, most
>of us are not GPL fanatics, and believe that if you are going to give
>something away, then give it totally away.

This isn't the place to discuss differences in philosophy between BSD
and Linux distributions.  However since the Linux community wants to
encourage commercial software, I'd like to make sure that no one is
misled by statements like this: the key players in Linux are not "GPL
fanatics".  A good deal of software in Linux is covered by the GPL,
but there are specific provisions (including a supplementary clause in
the kernel license, and care in implementing libc) to make sure that
it is possible to do commercial software.  Real GPL fanatics consider
that "software hoarding" and want to stop it.  Specific questions
about what is and isn't possible should be dealt with in the Linux
newsgroups.
-- 
this is a signature