Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!think.com!unixland!rmkhome!rmk From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 680x0 version of 386BSD?? [Was: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??] Message-ID: <9208192322.28@rmkhome.UUCP> Date: 20 Aug 92 04:22:20 GMT References: <1992Aug17.215858.14408@news.iastate.edu> <1992Aug18.105723.13123@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de> <1992Aug18.174205.23671@news.iastate.edu> <1992Aug19.093937.14857@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Organization: The Man With Ten Cats Lines: 21 In article <1992Aug19.093937.14857@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de> volker@sfb256.iam.uni-bonn.de ( Volker A. Brandt ) writes: >In article <1992Aug18.174205.23671@news.iastate.edu> niko@iastate.edu (Nikolaus E Schuessler) writes: >>Since most of the source is written in C, I believe that most of the time >>is going to be spent writing drivers for disks, displays, etc... > >Right, that's what I thought too. It's just that the project is too big for >me to do alone. > >>What platform did you have in mind? > >Atari TT or Falcon (68030). But what I consider most important is the fact >that - when done right - the binaries of all 680x0 implementations will be >interchangeable, just like the Minix versions for Atari, Mac and Amiga. There is a 680x0 binary standard for SVR4 systems, but I'm not sure who is supporting it besides Commodore. -- Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.UUCP unixland!rmkhome!rmk rmk@frog.UUCP