Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2835 comp.lang.basic.visual:28541 comp.lang.basic.visual.misc:1171 comp.databases.sybase:11953 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: jebarron@ix.netcom.com (Jon Barron) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.databases.sybase Subject: Re: Visual Basic vs. PowerBuilder Date: 17 Dec 1994 00:17:27 GMT Organization: Netcom Lines: 11 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3ctamn$ac6@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> References: <davebo.18.0010EDAE@mcs.com> <3c2lmn$669@explorer.csc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-pl4-08.ix.netcom.com In <3c2lmn$669@explorer.csc.com> mpfeifer@csc.com (Mark Pfeifer) writes: > >The simply answer is if you want to do database applications, PowerBuilder is going to be a better choice. Visual Basic does not offer any control which is >equivalent to PB's DataWindow. > So? PowerBuilder does not offer .VBXs. This alone can make or break a project. Regards, Jon