Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:2839 comp.lang.basic.visual:28627 comp.lang.basic.visual.misc:1204 comp.databases.sybase:11986 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!inferno.mpx.com.au!ion.apana.org.au!ion.apana.org.au!dzamm From: dzamm@ion.apana.org.au (David Zammit) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.databases.sybase Subject: Re: Visual Basic vs. PowerBuilder Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.lang.basic.visual,comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.databases.sybase Date: 18 Dec 1994 05:02:51 GMT Organization: Internet Online - on the APANA network in NSW Australia. Lines: 16 Distribution: world Message-ID: <3d0fpr$ro3@ion.apana.org.au> References: <3ctamn$ac6@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ion.apana.org.au X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] Jon Barron (jebarron@ix.netcom.com) wrote: : In <3c2lmn$669@explorer.csc.com> mpfeifer@csc.com (Mark Pfeifer) writes: : > : >The simply answer is if you want to do database applications, PowerBuilder is : going to be a better choice. Visual Basic does not offer any control which is : >equivalent to PB's DataWindow. : > : So? PowerBuilder does not offer .VBXs. This alone can make or break a project. Yes it does. Regards, David Zammit