Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.powerpc:30133 comp.sys.intel:25813 comp.os.misc:3538 comp.unix.bsd:15666 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7825 comp.unix.sys5.r4:8872 comp.unix.misc:15168 comp.os.linux.development:21547 comp.os.linux.misc:32084 comp.os.linux.misc:32085 comp.os.386bsd.development:2856 comp.os.386bsd.misc:4490 Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.misc,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!bitbug From: bitbug@netcom.com (James Buster) Subject: Re: Interested in PowerPC for Linux / FreeBSD / NetBSD? Message-ID: <bitbugD13572.M2J@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <3cilp3$143@news-2.csn.net> <MICHAELV.94Dec19115633@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> <3d4o1h$7bh@galaxy.ucr.edu> <3d4ucp$sbn@hearst.cac.psu.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 1994 01:23:26 GMT Lines: 13 In article <3d4ucp$sbn@hearst.cac.psu.edu>, Kenneth J. Hoover <ken@psuedvax.ed.psu.edu> wrote: >NT is designed to be a high-performance SERVER for the (gaack) "enterprise" >that's easy to admin while being B2-level secure [yeah, I know it's only been >C2-certified so far], not some kind of thrill ride for the computer- >masochistic like UN*X is. Does NT have MAC, secure install, or any real audit capability? You're a *long* way away from B2 without them. I'm still waiting for their formal security spec, too. -- James Buster bitbug@netcom.com