Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!ping.de!antido.ping.de!anti Date: 21 Dec 1994 00:56:00 +0100 From: anti@antido.ping.de (Andreas Timmermann) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Message-ID: <5cHcIZy1sQB@antido.ping.de> References: <D0zz94.JLE@inter.NL.net> <CGD.94Dec18033914@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU> <D10BF2.DnJ@hermes.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> <CGD.94Dec18090321@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU> <3d4lug$45d@valis.worldgate.edmonton.ab.ca> Subject: Re: Building 4.4BSDLite OS X-Newsreader: XP v3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Private Usenet/Internet-Site Lines: 18 Kevin B. Fluet <3d4lug$45d@valis.worldgate.edmonton.ab.ca> writes: > [...] The printed, bound docs from O'Reilly/USENIX are also very > nice to have. > [...] > Huh? I think he's talking about BSD here, which generally includes lots of > documentation in source format. At least my BSD/OS CD did. What does the > BSD doc set have to do with USL? > > -- kevin In what do the printed docs from O'Reilly/USENIX and the electronically available information differ? The books are surely nice, but expensive. What 4.4BSD-Lite documentation is in the FreeBSD 2.0R source distribution? -- Andreas Timmermann -- Dortmund, Germany -- anti@antido.ping.de -- ==8-?