Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4516 comp.os.linux.misc:32195 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!otis.apana.org.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!swrinde!pipex!sunic!isgate!veda.is!adam From: adam@veda.is (Adam David) Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV) Organization: Veda Systems, Iceland Message-ID: <D13uDL.10u@veda.is> References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <3cdn8t$q89@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> <msand.2.2EF28FBA@Neosoft.Com> <3cv6jg$fqt@ns.mcs.kent.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 1994 10:27:21 GMT Lines: 12 macar@Nimitz.mcs.kent.edu (Mike Acar) writes: >Ahh, yes... OS/9 Level II running on a Color Computer 3 w/ 512k of memory... >More stable *preemptive* multitasking than you can find on Windows in 8 megs of >RAM. Those were the days... :) Don't expect me to give up my 486 and go back, >however. :) These days, you can get it for 680x0 and 80x86 32-bit architectures. It's not free, but then neither is every other good thing. -- Adam David <adam@veda.is>