Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.powerpc:30516 comp.sys.intel:26634 comp.os.misc:3569 comp.unix.bsd:15707 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7870 comp.unix.sys5.r4:8905 comp.unix.misc:15227 comp.os.linux.development:21678 comp.os.linux.misc:32256 comp.os.linux.misc:32257 comp.os.386bsd.development:2889 comp.os.386bsd.misc:4528 Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.misc,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Interested in PowerPC for Linux / FreeBSD / NetBSD? Followup-To: alt.religion.computers Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <D163K2.CKJ@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <3cilp3$143@news-2.csn.net> <3d4o1h$7bh@galaxy.ucr.edu> <3d4ucp$sbn@hearst.cac.psu.edu> <3d7lt7$c0f@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 1994 15:40:50 GMT Lines: 9 In article <3d7lt7$c0f@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, Doug Dejulio <ddj+@pitt.edu> wrote: >Is the problem that the NFS implementation doesn't come from >Microsoft? (I think we got it from Intergraph.) The problem is the NT people complain about the stuff you have to add to UNIX to make it do what *they* want to do, even though it's free, then talk about NT as if the stuff we'd need to add to do what we want it to do wasn't at least as hairy to add and costs money.