Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.powerpc:30845 comp.sys.intel:27418 comp.os.misc:3626 comp.unix.bsd:15777 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:7934 comp.unix.sys5.r4:8977 comp.unix.misc:15338 comp.os.linux.development:21881 comp.os.linux.misc:32557 comp.os.linux.misc:32558 comp.os.386bsd.development:2942 comp.os.386bsd.misc:4600 Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.misc,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: VMS => WNT (was: Interested in PowerPC for Linux / FreeBSD / NetBSD?) Followup-To: comp.os.misc,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <D1Ltw2.FvJ@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <3cilp3$143@news-2.csn.net> <dyue.788655868@femto> <MICHAELV.94Dec28203707@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> <D1Lrr1.Kn@murdoch.acc.virginia.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 1994 03:33:38 GMT Lines: 15 >|Dave Cutler has designed three OS's: RSX, VMS, NT. There's a common thread >|running through all three; many ideas are common to all of them. Each, how- >|ever, also has a flavor of "keep the good ideas of the old, throw out the >|bad" - and add in important new things along the way. Speaking as someone who went from TOPS-20 to UNIX and RSX to VMS and back to UNIX, I much prefer RSX to VMS in many ways. A lot of the "new things" added to VMS (and back-ported to RSX) were counterproductive, and some of the stuff in RSX that was thrown out turned out to be really quite important. Porting software from RSX to VMS occasionally ran into "you can't do that" type walls. To do it justice, I'll say the same was true from RSX to UNIX, but at least in UNIX the programs usually got a lot smaller, simpler, and more general in the process, even if I had to give up good async I/O... and nobody was claiming UNIX was a complete replacement for a realtime O/S like RSX as they were for VMS.