Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4650 comp.os.linux.misc:32741 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!night.primate.wisc.edu!caen!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <D1B81t.24H@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <msand.2.2EF28FBA@Neosoft.Com> <D18449.Kvs@park.uvsc.edu> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 1994 10:05:53 GMT Lines: 9 In article <D18449.Kvs@park.uvsc.edu>, Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu> wrote: >VMS had installed images early on, but I don't think it was nearly >that early. RSX-11 uses loadable modules for things like the file system. It was also the *first* system that Dave Cutler worked on, and personally I prefer it to either of the later ones.