Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4637 comp.os.linux.misc:32713 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!wes From: wes@indirect.com (Barnacle Wes) Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX Message-ID: <D1qzJ6.206@indirect.com> Sender: usenet@indirect.com (Darin Wayrynen) Organization: the Briney (notso) Deep Date: Sun, 1 Jan 1995 22:23:30 GMT References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <msand.2.2EF28FBA@Neosoft.Com> <D18449.Kvs@park.uvsc.edu> <D1B81t.24H@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2.1 [BP] PL2.1] Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Lines: 16 Peter da Silva (peter@bonkers.taronga.com) wrote: : In article <D18449.Kvs@park.uvsc.edu>, : Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu> wrote: : >VMS had installed images early on, but I don't think it was nearly : >that early. : RSX-11 uses loadable modules for things like the file system. : It was also the *first* system that Dave Cutler worked on, and personally : I prefer it to either of the later ones. Let's port RSX to the PC/386 architecture! It may sound silly, but I bet it would be *screaming* fast. Well, maybe we should just stick to RT-11, but then that would be CPM-86, wouldn't it? ;^) Wes Peters