Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4734 comp.os.linux.misc:33029 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!news.clark.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.u.washington.edu!tzs From: tzs@u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX Date: 8 Jan 1995 14:01:10 GMT Organization: University of Washington School of Law, Class of '95 Lines: 10 Message-ID: <3eor76$1hm@nntp1.u.washington.edu> References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <D18449.Kvs@park.uvsc.edu> <D1B81t.24H@bonkers.taronga.com> <D1qzJ6.206@indirect.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: stein3.u.washington.edu In article <D1qzJ6.206@indirect.com>, Barnacle Wes <wes@indirect.com> wrote: >Let's port RSX to the PC/386 architecture! It may sound silly, but I >bet it would be *screaming* fast. Well, maybe we should just stick to >RT-11, but then that would be CPM-86, wouldn't it? ;^) A Unix port to the 386 architecture would be nice. (I mean real Unix, not these new fanlged bloated things like System V, BSD, or Linux. It's time for a port of V7). --Tim Smith