Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4812 comp.os.linux.misc:33360 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jkh From: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX Date: 14 Jan 1995 19:20:53 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3f986l$m20@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <3esdao$gjg@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <3f7dp6$fgr@NNTP.MsState.Edu> <LEWIS.95Jan14120836@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu In article <LEWIS.95Jan14120836@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu>, Lewis <lewis@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu> wrote: >It is, and it's very nice, and all. I just spent last night >re-installing an SCO system for a client, and it's not all that bad, >really. No, really. The administration tools are reasonable, and if >you follow the documentation closely, everything is reasonably easy. Sigh. Another happy SCO user who's never actually tried to any serious *development* on it.. SCO Open Death Trap - just say NO! :-) [I worked on the SCO port of Lotus NOTES - I've done my time! :-)] Jordan