*BSD News Article 40876


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4820 comp.os.linux.misc:33398
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!serval.net.wsu.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!oracle.pnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!lll-winken.llnl.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsfeed.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.CC.Lehigh.EDU!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!lewis
From: lewis@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu (Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: BSD vs. LINUX
Date: 14 Jan 1995 17:08:36 GMT
Organization: Little, if any
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <LEWIS.95Jan14120836@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu>
References: <KSTAILEY.94Dec8195010@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> <D1qzJ6.206@indirect.com>
	<3eor76$1hm@nntp1.u.washington.edu> <3esdao$gjg@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
	<3f7dp6$fgr@NNTP.MsState.Edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu
In-reply-to: js1@Microwave2.PH.MsState.Edu's message of 14 Jan 1995 02:43:50 GMT

In article <3f7dp6$fgr@NNTP.MsState.Edu> js1@Microwave2.PH.MsState.Edu (Jiann-Ming Su) writes:
>I thought SCO UNIX was a real unix for PC's?

It is, and it's very nice, and all.  I just spent last night
re-installing an SCO system for a client, and it's not all that bad,
really.  No, really.  The administration tools are reasonable, and if
you follow the documentation closely, everything is reasonably easy.
(and no, I did NOT use their system administration shell and it was
the first time I had ever touched SCO.  They called me because it
crashed, and the installer is long since out of business.)

The problem is that it costs money.  From my standpoint, it costs lots
of money.

With SCO, you put the money into the OS, and it comes with tools that
take care of everything for you, as long as you do it their way.  With
Linux/*BSD, you put the money into the time that you lose when setting
things up by digging through the configuration files by hand, but you
can do things any way you want.

If you think about it, SCO _can_ be cheaper in the long run, for
commercial installations.  (Less money spent on people time)

Some of us, however, prefer to spend our time mucking with the config
files ourselves, and would do it anyway, so it's the other way around.
--
Lewis Tanzos - lewis@ds9.lesn.lehigh.edu - ljt3@lehigh.edu