*BSD News Article 41239


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:4956 comp.os.linux.misc:33696 comp.os.os2.advocacy:74972
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!wasatch.com!usenet
From: bobh@wasatch.com (Bob Hauck)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux thoroughly insulted by Infoworld!
Date: 20 Jan 1995 16:06:55 GMT
Organization: Wasatch Communications
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <3fon2v$ao5@lonepeak.wasatch.com>
References: <D2o50q.sps@ns1.nodak.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hauck_pc.slc.unisysgsg.com
X-Newsreader: LA Times for OS/2 [version: 3.3e]

In message <D2o50q.sps@ns1.nodak.edu> - tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark Tinguel
y) writes:
>In article <950116203411@lambada> ed.duomo@lambada.oit.unc.edu ("Mr. Ed") writes:
>>In the columns section of the Jan 16 Infoworld, there is a column
>>highly insulting to linux. In it the writer basically says the
>>following:
>>
>>  o linux is really not free
>>  o linux users are as neurotic as Amiga fans
>>  o linux is difficult to install (their senior systems analyst
>>    apparently failed to install it)
>>  o linux should be called "underware"!
>
>When I read the article I got the impression that the author did not
>know what to think of Linux. He did not know what to call it.


I can't stand it anymore!  It's 'underware', not like Hanes, but a
play on 'underdog' and 'software'.

Underdog + Software = UnderdogWare -> underware.

I feel better now...back to the regularly scheduled flame-throwing.


==================================================================
 Bob Hauck                                       bobh@wasatch.com
==================================================================