Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!zib-berlin.de!gs.dfn.de!fauern!rrze.uni-erlangen.de!rachael.franken.de!pizza.franken.de!vulcan.franken.de!scratchy From: scratchy@vulcan.franken.de (Volker Paepcke) Subject: Re: [?]FreeBSD Kernel arch Sender: scratchy@vulcan.franken.de (Volker Paepcke) Organization: none Message-ID: <SCRATCHY.95Jan20191556@vulcan.franken.de> References: <1995Jan19.023343.20100@wdl.loral.com> In-Reply-To: rpt@miles's message of Thu, 19 Jan 1995 02:33:43 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1995 18:15:55 GMT Lines: 29 In article <1995Jan19.023343.20100@wdl.loral.com> rpt@miles (Richard Toren) writes: I am trying to install UPS debugger 2.4.5. The code contains conditionals for 'bsdi'. Since I am not a kernel level guy (yet), I could use any advice about similarities / differences between 'bsdi' and 'FreeBSD' kernal architecture. The make was doing fine (just vparms.h not where expected) until I got to the ups/core.c file. This went bonkers. Can I simply define bsdi? (it couldn't be that simple). Are the data structures the same? On another subject, is anyone porting xcpustate??? Rip Toren rpt@miles.sso.loral.com I'm running UPS-3.7alpha right now under FreeBSD-2.0. Since its using gdb-4.13 and FreeBSD includes gdb-4.11 I had to port gdb-4.13 first. But I think its running quite stable now and I'm going to create a port for it in a few days. The same goes for xcpustate! Volker Paepcke