Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jkh From: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: Another weird 950112-SNAP problem Date: 24 Jan 1995 03:02:05 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3g1qjd$g5l@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <3g1au3$b0f@satisfied.elf.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu In article <3g1au3$b0f@satisfied.elf.com>, *Hobbit* <hobbit@asylum.sf.ca.us> wrote: >A kernel built from this distribution seems unable to add a route, default or >otherwise, returning with "protocol not supported". A quickish look through >the relevant files sees kern/socket.c calling stuff in net/route.c, which under Did you only install the srcdist? You need to update all utilities that muck with routing, since this changed.. Make the world from the snapshot source (or current) and the world should be happy again. >usr/src/sys is "good enough". What about usr/src/include? Any other stuff I route.h is what changed, so I wouldn't be surprised. >Also, various files in FreeBSD-current seem incomplete. net/route.c, for >example, is truncated. That was fixed today, thanks! Jordan