Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jkh From: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: uucico/cu/tip tty locking Date: 1 Feb 1995 01:04:29 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3gmmmt$b31@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <WCP.95Jan31171003@lpds.lpds.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu In article <WCP.95Jan31171003@lpds.lpds.com>, Walter C. Pelissero <wcp@lpds.sublink.org> wrote: >While configuring flexfax on a brand new FreeBSD 2.0 box, I found that >the uucp package (Taylor 1.0.5) that comes with the os is configured >with SysV style locks, while tip uses BSD style. > >Before I start recompiling uucico with BSD locks, does anyone know >which one should be the standard style for uucp lock files under >FreeBSD 2.0? Actually, I think the general concensus is to throw the tip that comes with FreeBSD away and use what's in /usr/src/gnu/libexec/uucp/cu :-) Jordan