Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!sun!amdcad!netcomsv!resonex!michael From: michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: time for comp.unix.bsd.386 Message-ID: <1992Aug27.095250.12729@resonex.com> Date: 27 Aug 92 09:52:50 GMT References: <1992Aug27.093740.29039@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1992Aug27.122244.23194@prism.poly.edu> <1992Aug27.091607.12110@resonex.com> Organization: Resonex Inc., Sunnyvale CA Lines: 16 In article <1992Aug27.091607.12110@resonex.com> michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan) writes: >Personally, I rather like Peter's recent suggestion of comp.os.posix.* Oops! I just noticed that Peter suggested comp.posix, and not comp.os.posix. Hmmm. I could probably go either way on that one. The comp.posix would more closely mirror the existing comp.unix heirarchy for OS versions contained therein, where comp.os.posix would put groups under comp.os with all other operating systems. I'd probably prefer comp.os.posix, but either one would be acceptable as parents for a new 386bsd group. -- Michael Bryan michael@resonex.com | ,_, Milk and Cheese in '92!!! | /oo \ "What the world needs now are some true words of wisdom, | <>__| like 'La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la'." -- Cracker | | U|