Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!zib-berlin.de!easix!knobel.GUN.de!andreas
From: andreas@knobel.GUN.de (Andreas Klemm)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: When will FreeBSD 2.1 be available?
Date: 12 Feb 1995 22:59:54 GMT
Organization: Solaris 2.4 research kitchen, D-41469 Neuss
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <3hm3ta$hl@knobel.GUN.de>
References: <mldD3oxoq.C9y@netcom.com> <3hb7n1$esb@news0.cybernetics.net> <3hinlr$dde@tyrell.s.bawue.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: knobel.gun.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Rodney Volz (rodney@tyrell.s.bawue.de) wrote:
: In article <3hb7n1$esb@news0.cybernetics.net>,
: James Robinson <james@hermes.cybernetics.net> wrote:
: >In article <mldD3oxoq.C9y@netcom.com>, mld@netcom.com (Matthew Deter) writes:
: >)dump.) I'm wondering A) if 2.0 is as stable as 1151.
: >)and B) if 2.1 is coming soon enough that I should wait for it,
: >)rather than go thru an install process twice... (once for 2.0 now and
: >)once for 2.1 later).
: >
: >IMO, 2.0R is not as stable as 1.1.5.1. On the other hand, it has a lot of added
: >features (as well as growing completely out of the new 4.4 lite code). YMMV.
: MMV. My mileage varies. I would have said just about the oposite; 2.0R
: is running here without any stability problems, while I had to
: downgrade from 1.1.5.1 to 1.0x because of problems with ttys and
: sudden reboots.
Don't try exotic / esoteric / ... and such kernel options and 2.0R
will be your friend :)
Other alternative, run the newest SNAP in the hope, it will be usefull.
Had no problems running 2.0R or SNAPS in the past...
--
andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH
Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ - Support Unix - akl@wup.de -
*** apsfilter - irgendwie clever ***
ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de:/pub/Linux/local/packs/APSfilter/aps-49...:-)