*BSD News Article 42408


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.apps:1675 comp.os.386bsd.development:3194 comp.os.386bsd.misc:5360 comp.unix.bsd:16153
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!caen!hookup!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!wes
From: wes@indirect.com (Barnacle Wes)
Subject: Re: Cannons Away: Vote NO on newsgroup reformation.
Message-ID: <D3x63K.D28@indirect.com>
Sender: usenet@indirect.com (Internet Direct Admin)
Organization: the briney, briney deep
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 03:38:08 GMT
References: <D3o5Ew.8x2@nbn.com> <3ha6og$pbk@sidhe.hsc-sec.fr> <kaleb.792253018@exalt> <3hbpf8$q7c@fasterix.frmug.fr.net> <kaleb.792343226@exalt> <3hebt1$1r2@park.uvsc.edu> <kaleb.792415474@fedora.x.org>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd
Lines: 26

Kaleb KEITHLEY (kaleb@fedora.x.org) takes Terry Lambert to task:
: This keeps coming up, and you can say it a thousand times, but mere
: saying it isn't going to make it true. 386BSD, FreeBSD 1.x, and NetBSD 
: 0.9 are all derivative works from the Berkeley UNIX Net/2 release,
: a combination of BSD UNIX 4.2 and BSD UNIX 4.3.

: FreeBSD 2.x and NetBSD 1.x are derivative works of of Berkeley UNIX 4.4, 
: specifically the 4.4Lite release.

: If you have some substantive evidence (besides another tiresome round 
: of "because I say so") that speaks to the contrary, then by all means 
: let's have it.

How 'bout last summer's consent decree, declaring once and forever
that '4.4 BSD Lite' contains no 'UNIX' source code?  You dork!

OK, so this is a fine legal point, but I'm really sick of this dweeb
arguing the point.  Everyone that uses FreeBSD or NetBSD got dragged
through the mud on this issue last year, so let's just say it once and
for all: 4.4-Lite is not UNIX!  FreeBSD is not UNIX!  NetBSD is not
UNIX!  None of us has to pay AT&T, Novell, or X/Open *any* licensing
fees!

Terry, stop arguing with this dweeb!  Both of you shaddup!  ;^)

	Wes Peters