Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.apps:1708 comp.os.386bsd.development:3227 comp.os.386bsd.misc:5470 comp.unix.bsd:16220 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!hookup!news.mathworks.com!news2.near.net!public.x.org!fedora.x.org!kaleb From: kaleb@fedora.x.org (Kaleb KEITHLEY) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Cannons Away: Vote NO on newsgroup reformation. Date: 13 Feb 95 12:13:01 GMT Organization: X Consortium, Cambridge, Massachusetts Lines: 22 Message-ID: <kaleb.792677581@fedora.x.org> References: <D3o5Ew.8x2@nbn.com> <3ha6og$pbk@sidhe.hsc-sec.fr> <kaleb.792253018@exalt> <3hbpf8$q7c@fasterix.frmug.fr.net> <kaleb.792343226@exalt> <3hebt1$1r2@park.uvsc.edu> <kaleb.792415474@fedora.x.org> <D3x63K.D28@indirect.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: fedora.x.org wes@indirect.com (Barnacle Wes) writes: >How 'bout last summer's consent decree, declaring once and forever >that '4.4 BSD Lite' contains no 'UNIX' source code? You dork! >OK, so this is a fine legal point, but I'm really sick of this dweeb >arguing the point. Everyone that uses FreeBSD or NetBSD got dragged >through the mud on this issue last year, so let's just say it once and >for all: 4.4-Lite is not UNIX! FreeBSD is not UNIX! NetBSD is not >UNIX! None of us has to pay AT&T, Novell, or X/Open *any* licensing >fees! >Terry, stop arguing with this dweeb! Both of you shaddup! ;^) Yes, petty insults make great arguments. I think I know who the dork/dweeb is. Unless you have something constructive to say, how about if you take your own advice and shaddap. -- Kaleb KEITHLEY