*BSD News Article 42977


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.development:3261 comp.os.386bsd.misc:5531 comp.os.misc:3847
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!newshost.marcam.com!news.mathworks.com!satisfied.elf.com!linux.elf.com!sra
From: sra@epilogue.com (Rob Austein)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: Does anyone have ISODE-8.0(SNMP) running under NetBSD1.0 FreeBSD 2.0?
Date: 28 Feb 95 02:27:37
Organization: Epilogue Technology Corporation
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <SRA.95Feb28022737@rurha-pente.epilogue.com>
References: <3is3e3$ppn@crl8.crl.com> <3ith1j$i4d@tiger1.ocs.lsu.edu>
	<3itro7$pkl@crl9.crl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rurha-pente.epilogue.com
In-reply-to: ggrant@crl.com's message of 27 Feb 1995 16:45:59 -0800

   From: ggrant@crl.com (Gary E. Grant)
   Date: 27 Feb 1995 16:45:59 -0800

   I have a customer (read that $$$ for those of you in academia :-) ) who 
   wants a FDDI driver for Net/FreeBSD with SNMP support.
    I got ISODE which is the motherload from whence SNMP s/w springs,
    and tryed to compile it out of the box and encountering compile errors
   and I wondered if any on the net had resolved these issues...

Um, that's an interesting view of ISODE and SNMP, to be sure.  Didn't
happen that way on the planet I was living on at the time, but perhaps
I've blundered into an alternate reality again without noticing.
Damn, where did I leave that tricorder?  Anyway....

Based on comments from new customers about the various free packages
they tried before deciding to go with the commercial SNMP package we
(Epilogue) license, if you want to go the freeware route, the CMU SNMP
code is almost certainly a better choice than the ISODE package.

Good luck.

--Rob Austein <sra@epilogue.com>