*BSD News Article 42997


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.sys.powerpc:34928 comp.sys.intel:32488 comp.unix.bsd:16287 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:8226 comp.unix.sys5.r4:9364 comp.unix.misc:16243 comp.os.linux.development:23750 comp.os.linux.misc:35971 comp.os.386bsd.development:3264 comp.os.386bsd.misc:5533 comp.os.misc:3851
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!romulus.ucs.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!alfa02.medio.net!news.sprintlink.net!jaring.my!oasys!othman
From: othman@oasys.pc.my (Othman bin Hj. Ahmad)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: flat rates for Internet/phone (Re: X on dial-in)
Message-ID: <NtFfvA3BBh107h@oasys.pc.my>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 95 11:43:09 -0800
References: <DANIEL.95Feb24172244@arcturus.compass-da.com> <phrD4G1np.MoG@netcom.com> <D4DH09.BAo@pe1chl.ampr.org> <D3s19v.4M7@pe1chl.ampr.org> <phrD4JrEA.2ss@netcom.com>
Organization: Personal,Kota Kinabalu,Sabah,Malaysia
Lines: 56

In <phrD4JrEA.2ss@netcom.com> phr@netcom.com (Paul Rubin) writes:
...
>But is that a documentable fact, or just speculation?  The main cost
>of providing you with local phone service is the wire between the
>switch and your house, and that wire is there whether you use it or
>not.  Next comes some analog electronics to interface your phone to

I work for Malaysian telecom and I happen to do just this sort of
analysis but on a rough basis and tailored to our customers and
equipment contracts. Unfortunately we never consider high erlang
i.e. 24 hour use. Mostly we only consider 0.25 Erlang per
subscriber, i.e. 1 line is shared by 4 customers.

The line cost is small if you live in dense areas like cities
and not far from switches. Our mostly rural areas cost about
US$800 but with 50% utilisation it should go up to US$1,600.

My guess for dense areas should be only about US$400 per
subscriber. Bearing in mind that overhead cable costs $30/km,
and poles cost $2000/km.

...
>into.  Having more conversations active at once might increase the
>bandwidth needs of this part, but inside-the-box is so cheap these
>days that adding enough for one additional 24 hr/day phone call would
>cost close to zero, I'd hope.
Our cost for a 4 to 1 multiplexed switches should be $200 per customer
for more than 50,000 switches, excluding cost of real property
like land, building and power. Let us say this is $100.

TOTAL cost for 4 to 1 switch is 400 + 300= 700, for dense areas.

If we use 1 to 1 multiplex, we need bigger space, power and more
expensive equipment. My guess is 4 times that of the 4 to 1.

Roughly total cost for 1 to 1 should be 400 + 300*4= 1600.

...
>The voice/data switch that I program at work really would not cost any
>more to operate if you used all the voice lines 24 hrs/day than if you
>used them 5 minutes/day, just because its cost if you used it as a

If all of you use them 24 hours a day, you may have to pay
4 times the capital cost and 4 times space and power to
accommodate a new switch. The line cost in your office is
negligible.
	Most probably you cannot put that switch in your small
room.

-- 

Disclaimer: I only speak for myself.

SABAH is Heaven.
Perpetual Clear Blue Sky, Sea and Mountains near modern civilisations,
but how long will this last?