*BSD News Article 43025


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus:168 comp.os.386bsd.questions:16853
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!helena.MT.net!nate
From: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Problems with PVI-486AP4, NCR53c810 and FBSD 2.0
Date: 2 Mar 1995 04:49:36 GMT
Organization: SRI Intl. - Montana
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <3j3ip0$mra@helena.MT.net>
References: <3iab71$5qu@gate.sinica.edu.tw> <3is55v$eq7@gate.sinica.edu.tw> <3it2ta$n8c@deep.rsoft.bc.ca> <3ivlsc$lfo@shell1.best.com>
Reply-To: "Nate Williams" <nate@sneezy.sri.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: trout.sri.mt.net

In article <3ivlsc$lfo@shell1.best.com>,
Russell Carter <rcarter@best.com> wrote:
>I ran some bonnie benchmarks back in December on NetBSD 1.0 and FreeBSD 2.0
>and saw about 2-3MB/s for NetBSD, 3-4 MB/s for FreeBSD.  I don't know why
>there should even be much difference.

Because David Greenman and John Dyson have beat on the VM and I/O system
*heavily* to improve the performance of FreeBSD.  The VM system in
FreeBSD is NOT 4.4lite anymore, but a brand-new system almost completely
re-written.  In FreeBSD 2.1, it has changed even more, and is now merged
with the buffer cache to improve performance even more.  Expect even
greater performance when 2.1 is released.



Nate

-- 
nate@FreeBSD.org       | Do you think SRI cares what I say?  They certainly
nate@sneezy.sri.com    | don't accept responsibility for my actions, so I
work #: (406) 449-7662 | obviously don't represent them on Usenet.
home #: (406) 443-7063 | *FreeBSD core member and all around tech. weenie*