Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!news.uoknor.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!newsfeed.gsfc.nasa.gov!news!kstailey From: kstailey@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov (Kenneth Stailey) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Confused by BSD :-( Date: 07 May 1995 15:45:32 GMT Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA Lines: 11 Message-ID: <KSTAILEY.95May7114532@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov> References: <3obtge$sa3@adam.cc.sunysb.edu> <D83CJq.9py@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov In-reply-to: thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov's message of Fri, 5 May 1995 05:57:26 GMT In article <D83CJq.9py@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov (Jason R. Thorpe) writes: I'm personally more enthusiastic about NetBSD. I'm using NetBSD as a research vehicle at NASA currently. I've also run it on a number of the 11 supported architectures: hp300, mac68k, sun3, sparc, amiga, and pmax, as well as i386. You mean 11 ports, not architectures. mac68k, sun3 and amiga are all the m68k 8k-page architecture and binary compatible.